|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1824
   |
Posted - 2013.09.26 19:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:From the squad finder dev blog: Quote:Disruption game play for adhoc groups of players to participate more in the meta game Is it just me or does this sound distinctly like there's going to be something to do that other players can 'disrupt'; perhaps something like PVE! please, please, please soon[tm] CCP
"Disruption" equals things like AWOX, corp theft, selling intel to the enemy, etc. Things that would "disurpt" a corp's operations either in match or out of match. |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1825
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 19:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aleksander Black wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:We're all so desperate for PVE...
It's kind of sad. Not me, Im perfectly fine blasting people. Different game modes to blast people would be nice, though, and beat pve for me. I just hope that the disruption gameplay has somethimg to do with that, like being able to sabotage a PC district or something.
Taken out of context it can mean anything. If I say I like cheese, out of context, you are missing the part where I only like cheese on the hamburger.
In context, disruption by a player joining a squad joining a match would be someone who is disrupting that squads advitivies in the match - public, FW, or PC. |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1832
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 22:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:Aleksander Black wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:We're all so desperate for PVE...
It's kind of sad. Not me, Im perfectly fine blasting people. Different game modes to blast people would be nice, though, and beat pve for me. I just hope that the disruption gameplay has somethimg to do with that, like being able to sabotage a PC district or something. Taken out of context it can mean anything. If I say I like cheese, out of context, you are missing the part where I only like cheese on the hamburger. In context, disruption by a player joining a squad joining a match would be someone who is disrupting that squads advitivies in the match - public, FW, or PC. If there's space and the squad isn't locked, you can already join someones squad. How can you then "disrupt" them and how does that come into anything meta? To me it seems you can only disrupt others if they're doing something that doesn't already involve you. With all current game modes everyone is engaged with the enemy team in one way or another - there's nothing to do to disrupt that isn't already the main point of the game. Thus, the only conclusion must be that disruption play implies new game modes that offer activities to be "disrupted".
Today, you can only join a squad once the match starts. After 1.5, however, you can find squads to join before the match starts.
Let's say Dust2Dust is having a PC battle, but there are only a few people online from the corp or from Top Men. To defend your district, you decide to advertise a public squad because you are desparate (again this is just a hypothetical). Well, what if I saw this from the other side - I jump on an alt and join your squad. I then proceed to kill you.
Disruption.
This is just the quick and obvious example of how to use this to disrupt, but there are others too I'm sure, for the creative merc.
Also, I think you are reading too much into what he says. |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1832
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 22:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Sounds more like awoxing, especially with the new TCO roles. A TCO invites his squad into a PC battle against his real corp, they turn on the blues, to make reds job easier!
This. |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1833
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 22:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Sounds more like awoxing, especially with the new TCO roles. A TCO invites his squad into a PC battle against his real corp, they turn on the blues, to make reds job easier! I don't understand. This implies a TCO role was given to an untrustworthy player. I really don't think this is the kind of thing that can be classed as disruptive play and would hardly be something new that TTG would list as something they're working on.
It happens. Trust me it can happen. |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1833
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 23:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:Django Quik wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Sounds more like awoxing, especially with the new TCO roles. A TCO invites his squad into a PC battle against his real corp, they turn on the blues, to make reds job easier! I don't understand. This implies a TCO role was given to an untrustworthy player. I really don't think this is the kind of thing that can be classed as disruptive play and would hardly be something new that TTG would list as something they're working on. It happens. Trust me it can happen. Entire billion ISK and thousand player corps and alliances can and are torn down by one person simply saying "I wonder if I can" "**** this" "Oh he's paying X amount more" Trust is not a word thrown around EVE lightly, and sooner of later Dust as well.
Truth from an Amarr. Wonders never cease |
|
|
| |
|